Amid growing concerns about Vladimir Putin’s potential escalation of conflict in Europe, British citizens are being advised to brace themselves for a level of warfare reminiscent of past generations. But what would such a scenario entail in the UK?
Last year, Prime Minister Keir Starmer downplayed talks of conscription in Britain. However, experts are worried about the adequacy of military personnel should a conflict arise. Anthony Professor Glees, an expert in European affairs from The University of Buckingham, emphasized the importance of bolstering the armed forces through conscription as a cost-effective measure to address looming threats.
According to a recent National Security Strategy report, the threat posed by nuclear weapons today is deemed more intricate than during the Cold War era. The report underscores the need for increased national security spending, with Prime Minister Keir Starmer committing to allocate 5% of GDP to national security over the next decade, aiming to align civilian and military priorities akin to post-1945 efforts.
If conscription were to be reinstated in the UK, certain occupations would likely be exempt. However, public opinion, as per a recent YouGov poll, leans towards supporting the conscription of both men and women in the event of a potential conflict, breaking from the historical exclusion of women from direct combat roles.
During World War II, Britain implemented National Service to augment military strength, enrolling men aged 18 to 41 initially, followed by single women and widows aged 20 to 30 without children. The war effort engaged a significant portion of the population, with exemptions for individuals in critical industries or deemed medically unfit. As the conflict progressed, conscription extended to older age groups, ensuring broad participation in civil defense activities.
Post-war, mandatory enlistment ceased, transitioning the armed forces to a volunteer-based structure. National Service persisted until 1963, after which women gained access to all military roles, including combat positions, following the lifting of restrictions in 2018.
In a contemporary context, the government is exploring innovative approaches to attract young recruits to military service. An upcoming initiative, set to launch in March 2026, will introduce a ‘gap year’ military program for individuals under 25, aiming to enhance army recruitment and foster essential life skills in response to geopolitical uncertainties, particularly concerning Russian threats.
Professor Anthony Glees commended the proposed gap year scheme as a positive step, reflecting on the relevance of national conscription highlighted in the National Security Strategy report. Despite the report’s emphasis on the evolving nuclear threat landscape, the absence of a conscription reference was noted as a significant oversight by Professor Glees.
While military conscription has been a contentious issue over the years, successive governments have rejected its implementation, favoring voluntary enlistment for defense forces. However, with shifting global security dynamics, advocates argue that National Service has become increasingly essential.
Professor Glees emphasized the strategic value of a well-trained national army in deterring potential aggressors, particularly underscoring the limitations of nuclear deterrence in current geopolitical realities.
In a troubling statement, a prominent Kremlin figure recently issued threats targeting European capitals, including the possibility of a nuclear strike on Britain. Such provocations have reignited fears of widespread conflict with far-reaching implications.
At Reach and our affiliated entities, we utilize cookies and other device identifiers to enhance site functionality, analyze usage patterns, and deliver personalized advertising. You can opt out of data sharing or sales by clicking the corresponding button on our webpage. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies and adhere to our Privacy Notice and Terms and Conditions.